U15 Girls' Doubles
Sanvi ShirodkarTanvika Vemavarapu vs Ashbah TahasildarKomal Kothari
Semifinal · Match #6 · Court 2 · Sun, Jul 19, 10:19 AM
U15 GD · SF
CompletedCourt 2
33:22
| Side | Games | G1 | G2 | G3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanvi Shirodkar / Tanvika Vemavarapu[4] | 1 | 10 | 17 | 15 |
| Ashbah Tahasildar / Komal Kothari[2], winner | 2 | 15 | 15 | 17 |
Match analytics
Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.
Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.
- Points played
- 89
- Match duration
- 33m
- Average scoring gap
- 17s
- Longest scoring gap
- 86s
3 games
Court 2
Between umpire taps
Game 2 at 14–14
Score & result
The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.
| Measure | Sanvi Shirodkar / Tanvika Vemavarapu | Ashbah Tahasildar / Komal Kothari |
|---|---|---|
| Games won | 1 | 2 |
| Points won | 42 | 47 |
| Point shareOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 47%42 of 89 points | 53%47 of 89 points |
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Sanvi Shirodkar / Tanvika Vemavarapu | Ashbah Tahasildar / Komal Kothari |
|---|---|---|
| On serveRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 48%20 of 42 rallies | 53%25 of 47 rallies |
| On receiveRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 47%22 of 47 rallies | 52%22 of 42 rallies |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 40%6 of 15 rallies | 60%9 of 15 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 53%8 of 15 rallies | 47%7 of 15 rallies |
| Longest streakYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 44 rallies | 66 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Sanvi Shirodkar / Tanvika Vemavarapu | Ashbah Tahasildar / Komal Kothari |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-end ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 52%15 of 29 rallies | 48%14 of 29 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 45%27 of 60 rallies | 55%33 of 60 rallies |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 33 points | 22 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 22 points | 33 points |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Sanvi Shirodkar / Tanvika Vemavarapu | Ashbah Tahasildar / Komal Kothari |
|---|---|---|
| Quicker pointsWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 45%20 of 44 rallies | 55%24 of 44 rallies |
| Longer pointsWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 50%22 of 44 rallies | 50%22 of 44 rallies |
| First gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 40%10 of 25 rallies | 60%15 of 25 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 47%15 of 32 rallies | 53%17 of 32 rallies |