Player comparison
Arnav Ramnathkar vs Harsh Mulik
U17 Boys' Doubles · U17 Boys' Singles
Data note: Arnav Ramnathkar 3 of 3 matches umpire-scored; Harsh Mulik 6 of 6. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Arnav Ramnathkar | Difference | Harsh Mulik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 0–3on-court record | 4–2on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 32%43–90 points | -23 | 55%170–138 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | —0 played | 0–11 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | —no seeded win | Vihaan Naik8 | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 40mavg 13m | -71 | 1h 51mavg 19m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Arnav Ramnathkar’s side of the court.
Every score reads Arnav Ramnathkar’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Arnav Ramnathkar | Difference | Harsh Mulik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 30%13 of 44 rallies | -24 | 54%91 of 169 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 34%30 of 89 rallies | -23 | 57%79 of 139 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 27%8 of 30 rallies | -28 | 54%79 of 145 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 44 rallies | -5 | 99 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 88 rallies | +1 | 77 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Arnav Ramnathkar | Difference | Harsh Mulik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 40%12 of 30 rallies | -13 | 53%41 of 77 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 30%31 of 103 rallies | -26 | 56%129 of 231 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | +10 pts | +13 | -3 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 30%9 of 30 rallies | -25 | 55%36 of 65 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 15%5 of 33 rallies | -45 | 60%36 of 60 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 36%12 of 33 rallies | -27 | 63%38 of 60 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 00 points | -3 | 33 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 11 points | -1 | 22 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Arnav Ramnathkar | Difference | Harsh Mulik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 12.2s | -4.1s | 16.4s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 41%27 of 66 rallies | -17 | 58%88 of 153 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 25%16 of 65 rallies | -30 | 54%82 of 151 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 27%17 of 62 rallies | -26 | 53%71 of 133 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 37%26 of 71 rallies | -19 | 56%84 of 151 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 34.7s | -63.8s | 98.5s |