Player comparison
Mihir Chafadkar vs Namish Revankar
U13 Boys' Doubles · U15 Boys' Doubles
Data note: Mihir Chafadkar 8 of 8 matches umpire-scored; Namish Revankar 4 of 4. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Mihir Chafadkar | Difference | Namish Revankar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 5–3on-court record | 0–4on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 56%223–174 points | +27 | 30%51–121 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | 0–11 played | —0 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | —no seeded win | —no seeded win | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 2h 12mavg 17m | +76 | 56mavg 14m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Mihir Chafadkar’s side of the court.
Every score reads Mihir Chafadkar’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Mihir Chafadkar | Difference | Namish Revankar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 56%125 of 223 rallies | +15 | 41%22 of 54 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 56%98 of 174 rallies | +32 | 25%29 of 118 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 57%104 of 181 rallies | +13 | 44%20 of 45 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 1414 rallies | +7 | 77 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 88 rallies | -6 | 1414 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Mihir Chafadkar | Difference | Namish Revankar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 55%50 of 91 rallies | +18 | 37%15 of 41 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 57%173 of 306 rallies | +29 | 27%36 of 131 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | -2 pts | -11 | +9 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 59%50 of 85 rallies | +39 | 20%8 of 40 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 57%46 of 81 rallies | +26 | 31%11 of 36 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 52%42 of 81 rallies | +35 | 17%6 of 36 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 44 points | +4 | 00 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 44 points | +3 | 11 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Mihir Chafadkar | Difference | Namish Revankar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 15.0s | +0.3s | 14.7s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 57%113 of 199 rallies | +27 | 30%26 of 86 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 56%110 of 195 rallies | +27 | 30%25 of 84 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 58%106 of 182 rallies | +31 | 27%22 of 82 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 57%109 of 192 rallies | +25 | 32%29 of 90 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 90.0s | +0.5s | 89.5s |