Player comparison
Niharika Parwar vs Sambhavi Bhardwaj
U17 Girls' Singles
Data note: Niharika Parwar 11 of 11 matches umpire-scored; Sambhavi Bhardwaj 8 of 8. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Sambhavi Bhardwaj |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 9–2on-court record | 5–3on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 62%340–208 points | +10 | 52%215–199 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | 1–12 played | 0–11 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | Saanvi Audi1 | Arnav Ramnathkar / Nidhi Nair1 | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 3h 30mavg 19m | +67 | 2h 23mavg 18m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Niharika Parwar’s side of the court.
Every score reads Niharika Parwar’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Sambhavi Bhardwaj |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 63%211 of 337 rallies | +16 | 47%99 of 212 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 61%129 of 211 rallies | +4 | 57%116 of 202 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 62%180 of 289 rallies | +17 | 45%63 of 139 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 1515 rallies | +4 | 1111 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 99 rallies | -2 | 1111 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Sambhavi Bhardwaj |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 63%80 of 127 rallies | +3 | 60%60 of 100 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 62%260 of 421 rallies | +12 | 49%155 of 314 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | +1 pts | -9 | +11 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 63%75 of 120 rallies | +17 | 46%39 of 85 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 70%78 of 111 rallies | +19 | 51%43 of 84 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 63%70 of 111 rallies | +20 | 43%36 of 84 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | 0%0 of 2 challenges | -100 | 100%1 of 1 challenges |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 33 points | -2 | 55 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 44 points | +3 | 11 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Sambhavi Bhardwaj |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 16.8s | +1.8s | 15.1s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 62%168 of 272 rallies | +8 | 54%110 of 205 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 63%167 of 267 rallies | +13 | 50%100 of 201 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 64%160 of 251 rallies | +11 | 53%102 of 193 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 65%165 of 252 rallies | +15 | 51%97 of 191 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 110.7s | +20.1s | 90.6s |