Player comparison
Niharika Parwar vs Tanaiah Da Silva
U17 Girls' Singles
Data note: Niharika Parwar 11 of 11 matches umpire-scored; Tanaiah Da Silva 1 of 1. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Tanaiah Da Silva |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 9–2on-court record | 0–1on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 62%340–208 points | +45 | 17%6–30 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | 1–12 played | —0 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | Saanvi Audi1 | —no seeded win | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 3h 30mavg 19m | +201 | 9mavg 9m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Niharika Parwar’s side of the court.
Every score reads Niharika Parwar’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Tanaiah Da Silva |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 63%211 of 337 rallies | +48 | 14%1 of 7 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 61%129 of 211 rallies | +44 | 17%5 of 29 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 62%180 of 289 rallies | +48 | 14%1 of 7 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 1515 rallies | +14 | 11 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 99 rallies | -5 | 1414 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Tanaiah Da Silva |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 63%80 of 127 rallies | +49 | 14%1 of 7 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 62%260 of 421 rallies | +45 | 17%5 of 29 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | +1 pts | +4 | -3 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 63%75 of 120 rallies | +43 | 20%2 of 10 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 70%78 of 111 rallies | +59 | 11%1 of 9 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 63%70 of 111 rallies | +52 | 11%1 of 9 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | 0%0 of 2 challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 33 points | +3 | 00 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 44 points | +3 | 11 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Tanaiah Da Silva |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 16.8s | +4.1s | 12.7s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 62%168 of 272 rallies | +45 | 17%3 of 18 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 63%167 of 267 rallies | +46 | 17%3 of 18 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 64%160 of 251 rallies | +39 | 25%5 of 20 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 65%165 of 252 rallies | +59 | 6%1 of 16 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 110.7s | +86.4s | 24.3s |