Player comparison
Sanvi Shirodkar vs Tanvika Vemavarapu
U15 Girls' Doubles · U15 Girls' Singles
Data note: Sanvi Shirodkar 5 of 5 matches umpire-scored; Tanvika Vemavarapu 4 of 5. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Sanvi Shirodkar | Difference | Tanvika Vemavarapu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 2–3on-court record | 2–2incl. 0–1 walkovers | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 53%158–140 points | +2 | 51%126–123 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | 0–22 played | 1–12 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | —no seeded win | —no seeded win | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 1h 39mavg 20m | +11 | 1h 28mavg 22m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Sanvi Shirodkar’s side of the court.
Every score reads Sanvi Shirodkar’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Sanvi Shirodkar | Difference | Tanvika Vemavarapu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 55%87 of 158 rallies | +2 | 53%66 of 125 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 51%71 of 140 rallies | +2 | 48%60 of 124 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 53%66 of 125 rallies | +3 | 49%43 of 87 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 1212 rallies | level | 1212 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 66 rallies | -2 | 88 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Sanvi Shirodkar | Difference | Tanvika Vemavarapu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 49%39 of 79 rallies | -3 | 53%38 of 72 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 54%119 of 219 rallies | +5 | 50%88 of 177 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | -5 pts | -8 | +3 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 55%33 of 60 rallies | +3 | 52%26 of 50 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 60%34 of 57 rallies | +5 | 54%26 of 48 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 60%34 of 57 rallies | +8 | 52%25 of 48 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 33 points | level | 33 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 33 points | +1 | 22 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Sanvi Shirodkar | Difference | Tanvika Vemavarapu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 15.2s | -0.7s | 15.9s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 53%78 of 147 rallies | -3 | 56%69 of 123 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 53%78 of 147 rallies | +7 | 46%56 of 122 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 50%62 of 125 rallies | -1 | 51%50 of 99 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 52%64 of 122 rallies | -3 | 56%55 of 99 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 86.4s | level | 86.4s |