Men's Doubles
Divyesh ShirsatFredrick Fernandes vs Aswin MannambalathShaheen C K
Quarterfinal · Match #12 · Court 1 · Sat, Aug 8, 7:05 PM
Summary
Aswin Mannambalath and Shaheen C K turn an 8-5 deficit into a straight-games quarterfinal win
Aswin Mannambalath and Shaheen C K were 5-8 down in the opening game, then won eight of the next nine rallies to take control against Divyesh Shirsat and Fredrick Fernandes. The second seeds completed a 15-9, 15-12 quarterfinal victory in 19 minutes on Court 1, advancing to match 14.
The first game initially belonged to the sixth seeds. Divyesh Shirsat and Fredrick Fernandes opened 4-1 ahead and reached 8-5, but Aswin Mannambalath and Shaheen C K levelled at the interval and pushed on to 13-8. Divyesh Shirsat and Fredrick Fernandes stopped the run at 9-13, yet the game ended two rallies later.
The same pattern returned in game two, only earlier. After Divyesh Shirsat and Fredrick Fernandes took the first rally, the second seeds won five straight to lead 5-1. They were 8-2 ahead at the interval and stayed in front despite a late three-rally response that reduced the gap from 14-9 to 14-12.
The rally figures underline how decisively the opening-game swing changed the match. Aswin Mannambalath and Shaheen C K produced the only eight-rally streak recorded, while Divyesh Shirsat and Fredrick Fernandes never exceeded three. The winners also won 16 of 29 points on their serve and 14 of 22 receiving, compared with eight of 22 on serve and 13 of 29 receiving for their opponents. Their 30-21 points total now sends them onward; Divyesh Shirsat and Fredrick Fernandes leave the quarterfinal with a strong start that could not survive the first game's reversal.
MD · QF
CompletedCourt 1
18:56
| Side | Games | G1 | G2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divyesh Shirsat / Fredrick Fernandes[6] | 0 | 9 | 12 |
| Aswin Mannambalath / Shaheen C K[2], winner | 2 | 15 | 15 |
Match analytics
Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.
Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.
- Points played
- 51
- Match duration
- 19m
- Average scoring gap
- 17s
- Longest scoring gap
- 38s
2 games
Court 1
Between umpire taps
Game 1 at 3–1
Score & result
The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.
| Measure | Divyesh Shirsat / Fredrick Fernandes | Aswin Mannambalath / Shaheen C K |
|---|---|---|
| Games won | 0 | 2 |
| Points won | 21 | 30 |
| Point shareOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 41%21 of 51 points | 59%30 of 51 points |
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Divyesh Shirsat / Fredrick Fernandes | Aswin Mannambalath / Shaheen C K |
|---|---|---|
| On serveRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 36%8 of 22 rallies | 55%16 of 29 rallies |
| On receiveRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 45%13 of 29 rallies | 64%14 of 22 rallies |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 50%5 of 10 rallies | 50%5 of 10 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 33%3 of 9 rallies | 67%6 of 9 rallies |
| Longest streakYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 33 rallies | 88 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Divyesh Shirsat / Fredrick Fernandes | Aswin Mannambalath / Shaheen C K |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-end ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 50%6 of 12 rallies | 50%6 of 12 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 38%15 of 39 rallies | 62%24 of 39 rallies |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 00 points | 33 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 33 points | 00 points |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Divyesh Shirsat / Fredrick Fernandes | Aswin Mannambalath / Shaheen C K |
|---|---|---|
| Quicker pointsWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 36%9 of 25 rallies | 64%16 of 25 rallies |
| Longer pointsWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 44%11 of 25 rallies | 56%14 of 25 rallies |
| First gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 38%9 of 24 rallies | 63%15 of 24 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 44%12 of 27 rallies | 56%15 of 27 rallies |