Men's Doubles
Om KunkolienkarSahil Sayed vs Devaj VaingankarShubham Swami
Qualifying Final · Match #4 · Court 2 · Fri, Aug 7, 6:55 PM
Summary
Om Kunkolienkar and Sayed Recover to Win Qualifying Final in Three Games
Om Kunkolienkar and Sahil Sayed turned a tight opening into a 2–1 win over Devaj Vaingankar and Shubham Swami in 32 minutes on Court 2, advancing from the qualifying final.
The first game repeatedly changed hands. Vaingankar and Swami opened a 4–1 lead, but Kunkolienkar and Sayed levelled at 5–5 and later recovered from 13–11 down. At 15–15, the winning pair took the final two rallies to claim the game 17–15.
Vaingankar and Swami answered in the second game. They led 4–2, were level at 8–8 and 10–10, then produced the decisive finish: five straight rallies carried them from 10–10 to a 15–10 win and forced the decider.
The third game was decided earlier. Kunkolienkar and Sayed started 2–0, stretched the lead to 6–2, and reached the interval at 8–6. After Vaingankar and Swami moved within 10–8, Kunkolienkar and Sayed won three consecutive rallies and closed 15–9.
The less obvious edge was at the game starts: Vaingankar and Swami won eight of the 15 opening rallies across the match, compared with seven for their opponents. Kunkolienkar and Sayed instead won 23 of 40 longer rallies, helping explain how they recovered the match after the second-game setback. Their 42–39 points margin now sends them on to match number 6.
MD · Qual final
CompletedCourt 2
32:28
| Side | Games | G1 | G2 | G3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Om Kunkolienkar / Sahil Sayed, winner | 2 | 17 | 10 | 15 |
| Devaj Vaingankar / Shubham Swami | 1 | 15 | 15 | 9 |
Match analytics
Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.
Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.
- Points played
- 81
- Match duration
- 32m
- Average scoring gap
- 18s
- Longest scoring gap
- 54s
3 games
Court 2
Between umpire taps
Game 2 at 0–0
Score & result
The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.
| Measure | Om Kunkolienkar / Sahil Sayed | Devaj Vaingankar / Shubham Swami |
|---|---|---|
| Games won | 2 | 1 |
| Points won | 42 | 39 |
| Point shareOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 52%42 of 81 points | 48%39 of 81 points |
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Om Kunkolienkar / Sahil Sayed | Devaj Vaingankar / Shubham Swami |
|---|---|---|
| On serveRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 50%21 of 42 rallies | 46%18 of 39 rallies |
| On receiveRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 54%21 of 39 rallies | 50%21 of 42 rallies |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 47%7 of 15 rallies | 53%8 of 15 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 53%8 of 15 rallies | 47%7 of 15 rallies |
| Longest streakYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 44 rallies | 55 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Om Kunkolienkar / Sahil Sayed | Devaj Vaingankar / Shubham Swami |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-end ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 53%10 of 19 rallies | 47%9 of 19 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 52%32 of 62 rallies | 48%30 of 62 rallies |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 33 points | 11 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 11 points | 33 points |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Om Kunkolienkar / Sahil Sayed | Devaj Vaingankar / Shubham Swami |
|---|---|---|
| Quicker pointsWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 45%18 of 40 rallies | 55%22 of 40 rallies |
| Longer pointsWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 57%23 of 40 rallies | 43%17 of 40 rallies |
| First gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 53%17 of 32 rallies | 47%15 of 32 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 63%15 of 24 rallies | 38%9 of 24 rallies |