Men's Doubles
Aniket RedkarVarun Pai Vernekar vs Avinash BhatChinmay Kamat
Qualifying Final · Match #5 · Court 3 · Fri, Aug 7, 7:22 PM
Summary
Avinash Bhat and Chinmay Kamat Close Out a 15-7, 15-7 Qualifying Win
At 4-4 in the opening game, the match’s longest gap arrived—and Avinash Bhat and Chinmay Kamat returned to the court with the score level, then took control. They beat Aniket Redkar and Varun Pai Vernekar 15-7, 15-7 on Court 3 in 18 minutes, advancing from the qualifying final.
The first game began with Bhat and Kamat winning the opening three rallies. Redkar and Pai Vernekar answered with three in a row to make it 3-3, and the contest was still tied at 4-4. From there, the eventual winners built a 7-4 lead, reached the interval at 8-5, and moved through the closing stretch from 9-7 by winning the final six rallies.
The second game offered less room for recovery. Bhat and Kamat opened 4-0, and although Redkar and Pai Vernekar narrowed the gap to 7-4, the leaders were 8-4 at the interval. A brief two-rally reply made it 9-5, but Bhat and Kamat then won three straight and later finished with two consecutive points for another 15-7 game.
The less obvious edge was at the start: Bhat and Kamat won seven of the 10 opening-game rallies recorded across both games, while Redkar and Pai Vernekar won three. They also took six of eight clutch rallies, compared with two for their opponents. With 18 points won on serve and 12 on receive, Bhat and Kamat consistently converted both sides of the rally, while Redkar and Pai Vernekar finished with 14 points overall. The two-game result sends Bhat and Kamat onward.
MD · Qual final
CompletedCourt 3
17:58
| Side | Games | G1 | G2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aniket Redkar / Varun Pai Vernekar | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Avinash Bhat / Chinmay Kamat, winner | 2 | 15 | 15 |
Match analytics
Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.
Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.
- Points played
- 44
- Match duration
- 18m
- Average scoring gap
- 22s
- Longest scoring gap
- 62s
2 games
Court 3
Between umpire taps
Game 1 at 4–4
Score & result
The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.
| Measure | Aniket Redkar / Varun Pai Vernekar | Avinash Bhat / Chinmay Kamat |
|---|---|---|
| Games won | 0 | 2 |
| Points won | 14 | 30 |
| Point shareOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 32%14 of 44 points | 68%30 of 44 points |
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Aniket Redkar / Varun Pai Vernekar | Avinash Bhat / Chinmay Kamat |
|---|---|---|
| On serveRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 20%3 of 15 rallies | 62%18 of 29 rallies |
| On receiveRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 38%11 of 29 rallies | 80%12 of 15 rallies |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 30%3 of 10 rallies | 70%7 of 10 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 33%3 of 9 rallies | 67%6 of 9 rallies |
| Longest streakYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 33 rallies | 66 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Aniket Redkar / Varun Pai Vernekar | Avinash Bhat / Chinmay Kamat |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-end ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 25%2 of 8 rallies | 75%6 of 8 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 33%12 of 36 rallies | 67%24 of 36 rallies |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 00 points | 00 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 00 points | 00 points |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Aniket Redkar / Varun Pai Vernekar | Avinash Bhat / Chinmay Kamat |
|---|---|---|
| Quicker pointsWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 32%7 of 22 rallies | 68%15 of 22 rallies |
| Longer pointsWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 32%7 of 22 rallies | 68%15 of 22 rallies |
| First gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 32%7 of 22 rallies | 68%15 of 22 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 32%7 of 22 rallies | 68%15 of 22 rallies |