U11 Boys' Doubles
Sambhav BhardwajVenanzio Fernandes vs Namish RevankarSrihaan Dessai
Semifinal · Match #5 · Court 6 · Sun, Aug 9, 11:42 AM
Summary
Namish Revankar and Srihaan Dessai Overturn a First-Game Loss to Reach the Final
Namish Revankar and Srihaan Dessai lost the opening game 15-10, then won the next two by the same score to defeat top seeds Sambhav Bhardwaj and Venanzio Fernandes in 25 minutes on Court 6.
The semifinal initially belonged to Bhardwaj and Fernandes. After an 8-8 tie in the first game, the seeded pair won seven of the next nine rallies to move 15-10 ahead. But the response was immediate: Revankar and Dessai turned a 2-0 deficit in game two into a 6-2 run, reached the interval at 8-3, and held on despite a late push that brought the score to 11-14.
The decider followed a similar pattern. Revankar and Dessai moved from 3-3 to 7-3, and their 8-5 interval lead became 10-5 soon afterward. Bhardwaj and Fernandes narrowed the gap to 9-11, but the unseeded pair kept the finish under control, taking the deciding game 15-12.
The less obvious edge came after the intervals: Revankar and Dessai won eight of 15 rallies, while Bhardwaj and Fernandes won seven. That contrast mattered because the winners were also stronger in their closing game, taking 15 of its 27 rallies. Bhardwaj and Fernandes earned 38 points to the winners’ 40, a narrow margin in a match decided by recovery rather than domination. Revankar and Dessai now advance to match 7.
U11 BD · SF
CompletedCourt 6
24:59
| Side | Games | G1 | G2 | G3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sambhav Bhardwaj / Venanzio Fernandes[1] | 1 | 15 | 11 | 12 |
| Namish Revankar / Srihaan Dessai, winner | 2 | 10 | 15 | 15 |
Match analytics
Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.
Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.
- Points played
- 78
- Match duration
- 25m
- Average scoring gap
- 16s
- Longest scoring gap
- 85s
3 games
Court 6
Between umpire taps
Game 1 at 0–1
Score & result
The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.
| Measure | Sambhav Bhardwaj / Venanzio Fernandes | Namish Revankar / Srihaan Dessai |
|---|---|---|
| Games won | 1 | 2 |
| Points won | 38 | 40 |
| Point shareOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 49%38 of 78 points | 51%40 of 78 points |
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Sambhav Bhardwaj / Venanzio Fernandes | Namish Revankar / Srihaan Dessai |
|---|---|---|
| On serveRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 42%16 of 38 rallies | 45%18 of 40 rallies |
| On receiveRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 55%22 of 40 rallies | 58%22 of 38 rallies |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 53%8 of 15 rallies | 47%7 of 15 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 47%7 of 15 rallies | 53%8 of 15 rallies |
| Longest streakYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 44 rallies | 66 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Sambhav Bhardwaj / Venanzio Fernandes | Namish Revankar / Srihaan Dessai |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-end ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 58%11 of 19 rallies | 42%8 of 19 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 46%27 of 59 rallies | 54%32 of 59 rallies |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 11 points | 22 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 22 points | 11 points |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Sambhav Bhardwaj / Venanzio Fernandes | Namish Revankar / Srihaan Dessai |
|---|---|---|
| Quicker pointsWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 49%19 of 39 rallies | 51%20 of 39 rallies |
| Longer pointsWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 49%19 of 39 rallies | 51%20 of 39 rallies |
| First gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 60%15 of 25 rallies | 40%10 of 25 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 44%12 of 27 rallies | 56%15 of 27 rallies |