Completed

BPS State Badminton Ranking Tournament 2026

NavelimAug 7 – 9, 2026

U11 Boys' Doubles

Mahipal Sinh ParmarPriyansh Sawant Dessai vs Aariketh ChariRajveer Tari

Semifinal · Match #6 · Court 5 · Sun, Aug 9, 11:50 AM

Summary

Parmar and Dessai Reach the Final After a Fast 15-6, 15-7 Semifinal Win

Mahipal Sinh Parmar and Priyansh Sawant Dessai took control early on Court 5 and never let their semifinal lead disappear, defeating Aariketh Chari and Rajveer Tari 15-6, 15-7 in 17 minutes on 9 August 2026.

The opening game turned on a sustained middle stretch. After Aariketh Chari and Rajveer Tari stayed within 3-2, Parmar and Dessai won seven of the next eight rallies to move 10-2 ahead. Their opponents briefly trimmed the gap to 12-5, but the winners closed the game 15-6.

The second game began even more sharply: Parmar and Dessai opened 3-0, reached 8-2, and held a six-point advantage at the interval. Chari and Tari then produced their best run, taking four straight rallies to cut the score to 9-6. That was the match’s clearest opening, but it closed immediately as Parmar and Dessai won the next six points for 15-6 and a 2-0 match victory.

The rally detail explains why the scoreline stayed one-sided despite that late second-game push. Parmar and Dessai won 18 of 29 rallies on their serve and 12 of 14 on receive, while Chari and Tari won only two of 14 when serving. The winners also took seven of nine rallies before the game-two interval and seven of nine after it, making the brief 9-2 to 9-6 swing a setback rather than a reversal.

Chari and Tari leave the semifinal with seven points in the second game, but Parmar and Dessai’s eight-rally streak and 30-13 total-points edge carried them through to the final.

U11 BD · SF

Completed

Court 5

16:45

U11 Boys' Doubles · Semifinal score
SideGamesG1G2
Mahipal Sinh Parmar / Priyansh Sawant Dessai, winner21515
Aariketh Chari / Rajveer Tari067

Match analytics

Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.

Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.

Points played
43

2 games

Match duration
17m

Court 5

Average scoring gap
14s

Between umpire taps

Longest scoring gap
48s

Game 2 at 1–0

Score & result

The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.

MeasureMahipal Sinh Parmar / Priyansh Sawant DessaiAariketh Chari / Rajveer Tari
Games won20
Points won3013
Point share70%30 of 43 points30%13 of 43 points

Serve & rally

Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.

MeasureMahipal Sinh Parmar / Priyansh Sawant DessaiAariketh Chari / Rajveer Tari
On serve62%18 of 29 rallies14%2 of 14 rallies
On receive86%12 of 14 rallies38%11 of 29 rallies
First 5 rallies70%7 of 10 rallies30%3 of 10 rallies
After intervals78%7 of 9 rallies22%2 of 9 rallies
Longest streak88 rallies33 rallies

Pressure & momentum

Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.

MeasureMahipal Sinh Parmar / Priyansh Sawant DessaiAariketh Chari / Rajveer Tari
Tight-end rallies60%6 of 10 rallies40%4 of 10 rallies
Baseline rallies73%24 of 33 rallies27%9 of 33 rallies
Max deficit overcome00 points00 points
Max lead surrendered00 points00 points
Challenge accuracyNo challengesNo challenges

Tempo & endurance

Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.

MeasureMahipal Sinh Parmar / Priyansh Sawant DessaiAariketh Chari / Rajveer Tari
Quicker points52%11 of 21 rallies48%10 of 21 rallies
Longer points86%18 of 21 rallies14%3 of 21 rallies
First game71%15 of 21 rallies29%6 of 21 rallies
Last game68%15 of 22 rallies32%7 of 22 rallies