U11 Boys' Singles
Sambhav Bhardwaj vs Venanzio Fernandes
Quarterfinal · Match #10 · Court 4 · Sat, Aug 8, 3:28 PM
Summary
Venanzio Fernandes Sweeps Sambhav Bhardwaj 15-7, 15-4 in 11 Minutes
Venanzio Fernandes needed only 11 minutes on Court 4 to move through the U11 Boys' Singles quarterfinal, beating third-seeded Sambhav Bhardwaj 15-7, 15-4. The match began at 3:28 pm and ended at 3:39 pm, with Fernandes advancing 2-0.
Bhardwaj opened the first game with the opening rally, but Fernandes quickly turned 1-1 into a 5-2 lead. He reached the mid-game interval at 8-3, and although Bhardwaj collected the next point, Fernandes answered with three straight rallies to make it 11-4. Bhardwaj briefly trimmed the margin to 12-6, yet Fernandes closed the game by winning three of the final four rallies.
The sharper break came at the start of game two. Fernandes won the first five rallies before Bhardwaj got on the board, then extended the advantage to 8-1 at the interval. Bhardwaj could not build a response: Fernandes won the next rally after the break and later took the last three points to finish 15-4.
The less obvious feature was how consistently Fernandes controlled the opening phases. He won eight of the match's first 10 game-opening rallies, while Bhardwaj won only two. Fernandes also won 19 of 30 rallies when serving and all 11 when receiving; Bhardwaj won 11 of 30 receiving rallies and none recorded on serve. That early control left Fernandes with no lead surrendered and a straightforward route into the next round.
U11 BS · QF
CompletedCourt 4
10:59
| Side | Games | G1 | G2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sambhav Bhardwaj[3] | 0 | 7 | 4 |
| Venanzio Fernandes, winner | 2 | 15 | 15 |
Match analytics
Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.
Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.
- Points played
- 41
- Match duration
- 11m
- Average scoring gap
- 13s
- Longest scoring gap
- 71s
2 games
Court 4
Between umpire taps
Game 1 at 0–0
Score & result
The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.
| Measure | Sambhav Bhardwaj | Venanzio Fernandes |
|---|---|---|
| Games won | 0 | 2 |
| Points won | 11 | 30 |
| Point shareOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 27%11 of 41 points | 73%30 of 41 points |
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Sambhav Bhardwaj | Venanzio Fernandes |
|---|---|---|
| On serveRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 0%0 of 11 rallies | 63%19 of 30 rallies |
| On receiveRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 37%11 of 30 rallies | 100%11 of 11 rallies |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 20%2 of 10 rallies | 80%8 of 10 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 22%2 of 9 rallies | 78%7 of 9 rallies |
| Longest streakYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 11 rallies | 55 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Sambhav Bhardwaj | Venanzio Fernandes |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-end ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 40%4 of 10 rallies | 60%6 of 10 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 23%7 of 31 rallies | 77%24 of 31 rallies |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 00 points | 11 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 11 points | 00 points |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Sambhav Bhardwaj | Venanzio Fernandes |
|---|---|---|
| Quicker pointsWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 24%5 of 21 rallies | 76%16 of 21 rallies |
| Longer pointsWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 30%6 of 20 rallies | 70%14 of 20 rallies |
| First gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 32%7 of 22 rallies | 68%15 of 22 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 21%4 of 19 rallies | 79%15 of 19 rallies |