Women's Doubles
Saba ShaikhTabassum Shaikh vs Anar SingbalNeha Sahakari
Quarterfinal · Match #2 · Court 2 · Fri, Aug 7, 7:58 PM
Summary
Anar Singbal and Neha Sahakari Overturn 8-4 Deficit to Beat Saba and Tabassum Shaikh
Anar Singbal and Neha Sahakari turned a 4-8 deficit into a 15-11 opening-game win, then finished the job 15-9 against fourth seeds Saba Shaikh and Tabassum Shaikh in a 21-minute quarterfinal on Court 2.
The first game initially belonged to Saba and Tabassum. They moved from 1-1 to 4-1 and reached the interval 8-4 ahead. But Anar and Neha immediately began erasing that advantage, taking the next three rallies to close to 7-8. Saba and Tabassum briefly restored a two-point cushion at 10-8, yet the fifth seeds then claimed seven of the last eight rallies. At 11-11, the game was theirs to control.
The second game was tighter early, with the score level at 2-2, 3-3, 4-4, 5-5 and 6-6. The decisive run followed the interval point: Anar and Neha won six straight rallies from 6-6 to lead 12-6. Saba and Tabassum answered with two points, but the fifth seeds held on to reach 14-8 and closed it at 15-9.
The rally detail makes the finish especially clear. Anar and Neha won nine of the 12 recorded clutch rallies, compared with three for their opponents, and improved from six wins in nine rallies before the intervals to eight in nine afterward. Their longest run was six; Saba and Tabassum’s was three. The fourth seeds were competitive in both games, but the late exchanges belonged consistently to Anar and Neha, who advance to match 5.
WD · QF
CompletedCourt 2
21:05
| Side | Games | G1 | G2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saba Shaikh / Tabassum Shaikh[4] | 0 | 11 | 9 |
| Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari[5], winner | 2 | 15 | 15 |
Match analytics
Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.
Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.
- Points played
- 50
- Match duration
- 21m
- Average scoring gap
- 20s
- Longest scoring gap
- 92s
2 games
Court 2
Between umpire taps
Game 2 at 0–0
Score & result
The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.
| Measure | Saba Shaikh / Tabassum Shaikh | Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari |
|---|---|---|
| Games won | 0 | 2 |
| Points won | 20 | 30 |
| Point shareOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 40%20 of 50 points | 60%30 of 50 points |
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Saba Shaikh / Tabassum Shaikh | Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari |
|---|---|---|
| On serveRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 33%7 of 21 rallies | 55%16 of 29 rallies |
| On receiveRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 45%13 of 29 rallies | 67%14 of 21 rallies |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 60%6 of 10 rallies | 40%4 of 10 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 11%1 of 9 rallies | 89%8 of 9 rallies |
| Longest streakYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 33 rallies | 66 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Saba Shaikh / Tabassum Shaikh | Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-end ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 25%3 of 12 rallies | 75%9 of 12 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 45%17 of 38 rallies | 55%21 of 38 rallies |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 00 points | 44 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 44 points | 00 points |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Saba Shaikh / Tabassum Shaikh | Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari |
|---|---|---|
| Quicker pointsWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 40%10 of 25 rallies | 60%15 of 25 rallies |
| Longer pointsWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 38%9 of 24 rallies | 63%15 of 24 rallies |
| First gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 42%11 of 26 rallies | 58%15 of 26 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 38%9 of 24 rallies | 63%15 of 24 rallies |