Completed

BPS State Badminton Ranking Tournament 2026

NavelimAug 7 – 9, 2026

Women's Doubles

Nidhi NairPreeti Papshetty vs Anjana KumariSufiya Shaikh

Quarterfinal · Match #4 · Court 6 · Fri, Aug 7, 7:43 PM

Summary

Anjana Kumari and Sufiya Shaikh Open With 10 Straight and Sweep Quarterfinal

Anjana Kumari and Sufiya Shaikh needed just 19 minutes to move through their quarterfinal, beating Nidhi Nair and Preeti Papshetty 15-7, 15-3 on Court 6.

The second-seeded pair set the tone immediately, taking the opening four rallies before Nair and Papshetty answered with two points. Anjana and Sufiya restored control at 2-4, reaching the interval 8-2 and then extending the lead to 11-3. Nair and Papshetty briefly found their best passage, winning four straight rallies to cut the margin to 11-7, but the response was decisive: Anjana and Sufiya won the next four rallies to close the game.

The match’s clearest turning point came at the start of the second game. Anjana and Sufiya won the first 10 rallies, leading 10-0 before Nair and Papshetty finally got on the board. That run made the second game far more one-sided than the first; the underdogs managed only three points, and the seeded pair finished 15-3.

The rally detail underlines how consistently Anjana and Sufiya controlled the exchange. They won nine of the 10 game-start points and claimed 24 of 30 points on their serve, while Nair and Papshetty won only four of 10 on theirs. Nair and Papshetty did improve after the intervals, taking two of nine points compared with none before them, but the deficit was already too large.

Anjana Kumari and Sufiya Shaikh advance from the quarterfinal, while Nidhi Nair and Preeti Papshetty leave with a match in which their four-rally surge was the only sustained change in momentum.

WD · QF

Completed

Court 6

19:13

Women's Doubles · Quarterfinal score
SideGamesG1G2
Nidhi Nair / Preeti Papshetty073
Anjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh[2], winner21515

Match analytics

Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.

Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.

Points played
40

2 games

Match duration
19m

Court 6

Average scoring gap
24s

Between umpire taps

Longest scoring gap
74s

Game 1 at 0–0

Score & result

The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.

MeasureNidhi Nair / Preeti PapshettyAnjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh
Games won02
Points won1030
Point share25%10 of 40 points75%30 of 40 points

Serve & rally

Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.

MeasureNidhi Nair / Preeti PapshettyAnjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh
On serve40%4 of 10 rallies80%24 of 30 rallies
On receive20%6 of 30 rallies60%6 of 10 rallies
First 5 rallies10%1 of 10 rallies90%9 of 10 rallies
After intervals22%2 of 9 rallies78%7 of 9 rallies
Longest streak44 rallies1010 rallies

Pressure & momentum

Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.

MeasureNidhi Nair / Preeti PapshettyAnjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh
Tight-end rallies25%2 of 8 rallies75%6 of 8 rallies
Baseline rallies25%8 of 32 rallies75%24 of 32 rallies
Max deficit overcome00 points00 points
Max lead surrendered00 points00 points
Challenge accuracyNo challengesNo challenges

Tempo & endurance

Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.

MeasureNidhi Nair / Preeti PapshettyAnjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh
Quicker points25%5 of 20 rallies75%15 of 20 rallies
Longer points25%5 of 20 rallies75%15 of 20 rallies
First game32%7 of 22 rallies68%15 of 22 rallies
Last game17%3 of 18 rallies83%15 of 18 rallies