Women's Doubles
Riya HaldankarYasmin Sayed vs Anar SingbalNeha Sahakari
Semifinal · Match #5 · Court 6 · Sun, Aug 9, 12:18 PM
Summary
Haldankar and Sayed Finish Strong to Reach the Final
At 11-11 in the opening game, Riya Haldankar and Yasmin Sayed found the first clear edge of a tight semifinal. They took four of the next five rallies to move from level to 15-12, beating Anar Singbal and Neha Sahakari 2-0 on Court 6 in 26 minutes.
The No. 5 pair stayed close throughout the opener, leading 8-6 before Haldankar and Sayed recovered the two-point deficit. The match’s longest gap came at 11-11, lasting just over 60 seconds, but the top seeds returned to win the next rally and then closed the game with three straight points.
The second game was even more compressed. Singbal and Sahakari led 5-3 and reached 8-6, yet Haldankar and Sayed repeatedly erased the margin. The score was tied at 8-8, 10-10, 11-11, 12-12, 13-13, 14-14 and 15-15 before the No. 1 pair claimed the final three rallies for an 18-16 finish.
The numbers underline how little separated them overall: Haldankar and Sayed won 33 points to Singbal and Sahakari’s 28. The decisive contrast was late-point execution, with the winners taking 12 of 20 clutch rallies compared with eight for their opponents. Singbal and Sahakari pushed the semifinal deep into both games, but Haldankar and Sayed’s closing runs carried them through to match 7.
WD · SF
CompletedCourt 6
25:42
| Side | Games | G1 | G2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riya Haldankar / Yasmin Sayed[1], winner | 2 | 15 | 18 |
| Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari[5] | 0 | 12 | 16 |
Match analytics
Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.
Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.
- Points played
- 61
- Match duration
- 26m
- Average scoring gap
- 20s
- Longest scoring gap
- 60s
2 games
Court 6
Between umpire taps
Game 1 at 11–11
Score & result
The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.
| Measure | Riya Haldankar / Yasmin Sayed | Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari |
|---|---|---|
| Games won | 2 | 0 |
| Points won | 33 | 28 |
| Point shareOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 54%33 of 61 points | 46%28 of 61 points |
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Riya Haldankar / Yasmin Sayed | Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari |
|---|---|---|
| On serveRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 30%10 of 33 rallies | 18%5 of 28 rallies |
| On receiveRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 82%23 of 28 rallies | 70%23 of 33 rallies |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 50%5 of 10 rallies | 50%5 of 10 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 67%6 of 9 rallies | 33%3 of 9 rallies |
| Longest streakYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 33 rallies | 33 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Riya Haldankar / Yasmin Sayed | Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-end ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 60%12 of 20 rallies | 40%8 of 20 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 51%21 of 41 rallies | 49%20 of 41 rallies |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 22 points | 00 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 00 points | 22 points |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Riya Haldankar / Yasmin Sayed | Anar Singbal / Neha Sahakari |
|---|---|---|
| Quicker pointsWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 50%15 of 30 rallies | 50%15 of 30 rallies |
| Longer pointsWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 60%18 of 30 rallies | 40%12 of 30 rallies |
| First gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 56%15 of 27 rallies | 44%12 of 27 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 53%18 of 34 rallies | 47%16 of 34 rallies |