Completed

BPS State Badminton Ranking Tournament 2026

NavelimAug 7 – 9, 2026

Women's Doubles

Riya HaldankarYasmin Sayed vs Anjana KumariSufiya Shaikh

Final · Match #7 · Court 1 · Sun, Aug 9, 5:17 PM

Summary

Anjana Kumari and Sufiya Shaikh Take Decider to Beat Top Seeds

At 2–2 in the deciding game, Anjana Kumari and Sufiya Shaikh turned a final into a rapid separation. The second seeds beat Riya Haldankar and Yasmin Sayed 15–13, 12–15, 15–7 in 30 minutes on Court 1, completing the comeback in the Women’s Doubles final.

The opening game was tight from the start. Haldankar and Sayed led 8–6 at the interval, but Kumari and Shaikh levelled at 8–8 and kept the finish close. At 13–13, the second seeds won the last two rallies to take the game 15–13.

Haldankar and Sayed answered in the second. They built an 8–5 lead, then saw Kumari and Shaikh win five straight rallies to move 10–9 ahead. The top seeds recovered again, taking the next six of seven rallies to close out the game 15–12 and force the decider.

The deciding game supplied the clearest turning point. After the score reached 2–2, Kumari and Shaikh won four consecutive rallies to lead 6–2. They were 8–2 ahead at the interval and stretched the margin to 12–4 before Haldankar and Sayed briefly narrowed it to 12–7. Two more rallies ended the contest.

The rally figures underline how the winners controlled the early phases: they won 9 of 15 game-start rallies, compared with 6 for their opponents, and won 23 of 35 points when receiving. Haldankar and Sayed had the stronger serve split, taking 12 of 35 serve points, but it was not enough. Kumari and Shaikh finished with 42 points to 35 and the deciding-game win that secured the title.

WD · Final

Completed

Court 1

30:20

Women's Doubles · Final score
SideGamesG1G2G3
Riya Haldankar / Yasmin Sayed[1]113157
Anjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh[2], winner2151215

Match analytics

Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.

Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.

Points played
77

3 games

Match duration
30m

Court 1

Average scoring gap
18s

Between umpire taps

Longest scoring gap
47s

Game 3 at 1–2

Score & result

The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.

MeasureRiya Haldankar / Yasmin SayedAnjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh
Games won12
Points won3542
Point share45%35 of 77 points55%42 of 77 points

Serve & rally

Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.

MeasureRiya Haldankar / Yasmin SayedAnjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh
On serve34%12 of 35 rallies45%19 of 42 rallies
On receive55%23 of 42 rallies66%23 of 35 rallies
First 5 rallies40%6 of 15 rallies60%9 of 15 rallies
After intervals40%6 of 15 rallies60%9 of 15 rallies
Longest streak55 rallies66 rallies

Pressure & momentum

Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.

MeasureRiya Haldankar / Yasmin SayedAnjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh
Tight-end rallies60%12 of 20 rallies40%8 of 20 rallies
Baseline rallies40%23 of 57 rallies60%34 of 57 rallies
Max deficit overcome22 points22 points
Max lead surrendered22 points22 points
Challenge accuracyNo challengesNo challenges

Tempo & endurance

Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.

MeasureRiya Haldankar / Yasmin SayedAnjana Kumari / Sufiya Shaikh
Quicker points45%17 of 38 rallies55%21 of 38 rallies
Longer points45%17 of 38 rallies55%21 of 38 rallies
First game46%13 of 28 rallies54%15 of 28 rallies
Last game32%7 of 22 rallies68%15 of 22 rallies