Player comparison
Anjana Kumari vs Niharika Parwar
Women's Doubles · Women's Singles
Data note: Anjana Kumari 6 of 6 matches umpire-scored; Niharika Parwar 2 of 3. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Anjana Kumari | Difference | Niharika Parwar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 6–0on-court record | 0–2incl. 1–0 walkovers | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 58%227–167 points | +11 | 47%74–84 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | 4–04 played | 0–22 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | Riya Haldankar / Yasmin Sayed1 | —no seeded win | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 3h 14mavg 32m | +123 | 1h 11mavg 36m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Anjana Kumari’s side of the court.
Every score reads Anjana Kumari’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Anjana Kumari | Difference | Niharika Parwar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 56%126 of 226 rallies | +12 | 44%33 of 75 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 60%101 of 168 rallies | +11 | 49%41 of 83 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 53%87 of 163 rallies | +13 | 40%21 of 52 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 1010 rallies | +2 | 88 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 88 rallies | +2 | 66 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Anjana Kumari | Difference | Niharika Parwar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 48%48 of 99 rallies | level | 49%20 of 41 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 61%179 of 295 rallies | +15 | 46%54 of 117 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | -12 pts | -15 | +3 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 65%52 of 80 rallies | +22 | 43%13 of 30 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 63%49 of 78 rallies | +16 | 47%14 of 30 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 62%48 of 78 rallies | +15 | 47%14 of 30 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 33 points | -1 | 44 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 55 points | +4 | 11 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Anjana Kumari | Difference | Niharika Parwar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 23.0s | +2.7s | 20.4s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 58%113 of 195 rallies | +12 | 46%36 of 78 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 58%112 of 193 rallies | +10 | 48%37 of 77 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 55%88 of 159 rallies | +3 | 53%28 of 53 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 70%90 of 129 rallies | +32 | 38%18 of 48 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 109.0s | -7.2s | 116.2s |