Player comparison
Om Kunkolienkar vs Paranjay Thakur
Men's Doubles · Men's Singles
Data note: Om Kunkolienkar 4 of 4 matches umpire-scored; Paranjay Thakur 2 of 2. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Om Kunkolienkar | Difference | Paranjay Thakur |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 2–2on-court record | 0–2on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 45%99–120 points | +10 | 35%33–60 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | 1–01 played | —0 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | —no seeded win | —no seeded win | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 1h 19mavg 20m | +46 | 33mavg 17m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Om Kunkolienkar’s side of the court.
Every score reads Om Kunkolienkar’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Om Kunkolienkar | Difference | Paranjay Thakur |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 42%42 of 99 rallies | +19 | 24%8 of 34 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 48%57 of 120 rallies | +5 | 42%25 of 59 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 45%33 of 74 rallies | +20 | 25%7 of 28 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 55 rallies | +1 | 44 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 77 rallies | +1 | 66 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Om Kunkolienkar | Difference | Paranjay Thakur |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 51%27 of 53 rallies | +19 | 32%7 of 22 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 43%72 of 166 rallies | +7 | 37%26 of 71 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | +8 pts | +12 | -5 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 42%19 of 45 rallies | +2 | 40%8 of 20 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 43%18 of 42 rallies | +10 | 33%6 of 18 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 40%17 of 42 rallies | -4 | 44%8 of 18 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 44 points | +4 | 00 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 11 points | -3 | 44 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Om Kunkolienkar | Difference | Paranjay Thakur |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 17.1s | +1.3s | 15.9s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 46%50 of 109 rallies | +20 | 26%12 of 46 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 44%47 of 108 rallies | -1 | 44%20 of 45 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 45%44 of 97 rallies | +17 | 29%12 of 42 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 46%45 of 97 rallies | +5 | 41%21 of 51 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 111.3s | +46.1s | 65.2s |