Player profile
Adharved Balakrishnan
1 event
Entered events
Performance analytics
- Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court.
- 1–1
- Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone.
- 46%
- Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line.
- —
- Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament.
- —
- Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length.
- 30m
on-court record
45–53 points
0 played
no seeded win
avg 15m
Data note: 2 of 2 played matches include rally insights; 2 include timing.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Serve & rally engine
Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.49%
Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point.43%
On this player’s serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's.49%
Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game.6 rallies
Longest streak againstThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away.6 rallies
Pressure & momentum
Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.39%
Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play.48%
Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you.-9 pts
Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win.2 points
Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose.3 points
First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up?50%
Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break.72%
After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help?44%
Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way.—
0 of 0 challengesTiming & endurance
Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.15.4s
Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges.48%
Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win.44%
Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on?40%
Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on?51%
Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match.114.8s · game 1
Event split
Singles and doubles stay separate, so the overall story never hides where the numbers came from.
| Event | Seed | W–L | Points won | Deciders | On court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U15 Boys' Singlessingles | — | 1–1 | 46% | — | 30m |
Match history
Every played match, from this player’s side of the court.
Avg rest 1h 21m · shortest 1h 21mTime off court between your matches on the same day.
| Result | Opponent | Event | Score | Duration | Started at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | Vivaan Betgeri | U15 Boys' SinglesQualifying Round 1 | 15–13, 15–10 | 18m | Fri, Jul 17, 5:18 PM |
| L | Samarth Sakhalkar | U15 Boys' SinglesQualifying Round 2 | 4–15, 11–15 | 12m | Fri, Jul 17, 6:57 PM |
Compare with an opponent
Both players’ tournaments side by side, with every meeting between them.