Completed

BPS State Badminton Ranking Tournament 2026

NavelimAug 7 – 9, 2026

Women's Doubles

Niharika ParwarSynnovia Dsouza vs Shivanjali ThiteShreya Mehta

Quarterfinal · Match #3 · Court 3 · Fri, Aug 7, 8:10 PM

Summary

Shivanjali Thite and Shreya Mehta Survive Three-Game Quarterfinal

At 12–12 in the deciding game, Shivanjali Thite and Shreya Mehta were still within reach. Three rallies later, the third-seeded pair had restored a 15–12 lead and the quarterfinal was theirs, 15–13, 14–16, 15–12, over sixth seeds Niharika Parwar and Synnovia Dsouza on Court 3.

The match opened with Parwar and Dsouza taking the first point, but Thite and Mehta answered quickly and moved from 2–2 to 6–3. A four-rally burst then turned that advantage around: Parwar and Dsouza reached 7–6 and later led 9–8. Thite and Mehta steadied the game at 9–9, won three straight to move 12–9 ahead, and held off a late push from 13–11 to close the opener 15–13.

Parwar and Dsouza responded in the second. They trailed 7–3 and were 8–8 at the interval, then built a 12–9 lead. Thite and Mehta recovered to 12–12, but the sixth seeds took the next two rallies and finished 16–14, forcing the decider after 29 minutes of play.

The deciding game followed the same pattern of pressure and recovery. Thite and Mehta led 6–2, were pegged back to 6–6, then moved ahead 8–6 and stretched the margin to 13–7. Parwar and Dsouza won five of the next seven rallies to reach 12–14, but Thite and Mehta ended the contest on their first match point.

The less obvious edge was at the starts: Thite and Mehta won eight of 15 opening-game rallies across the match, compared with seven for their opponents. Their six-rally streak in the match was also the longest run by either side. That small early advantage carried the third seeds into the next round.

WD · QF

Completed

Court 3

29:28

Women's Doubles · Quarterfinal score
SideGamesG1G2G3
Niharika Parwar / Synnovia Dsouza[6]1131612
Shivanjali Thite / Shreya Mehta[3], winner2151415

Match analytics

Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.

Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.

Points played
85

3 games

Match duration
29m

Court 3

Average scoring gap
18s

Between umpire taps

Longest scoring gap
116s

Game 1 at 11–13

Score & result

The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.

MeasureNiharika Parwar / Synnovia DsouzaShivanjali Thite / Shreya Mehta
Games won12
Points won4144
Point share48%41 of 85 points52%44 of 85 points

Serve & rally

Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.

MeasureNiharika Parwar / Synnovia DsouzaShivanjali Thite / Shreya Mehta
On serve48%20 of 42 rallies51%22 of 43 rallies
On receive49%21 of 43 rallies52%22 of 42 rallies
First 5 rallies47%7 of 15 rallies53%8 of 15 rallies
After intervals53%8 of 15 rallies47%7 of 15 rallies
Longest streak44 rallies66 rallies

Pressure & momentum

Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.

MeasureNiharika Parwar / Synnovia DsouzaShivanjali Thite / Shreya Mehta
Tight-end rallies54%14 of 26 rallies46%12 of 26 rallies
Baseline rallies46%27 of 59 rallies54%32 of 59 rallies
Max deficit overcome44 points11 points
Max lead surrendered11 points44 points
Challenge accuracyNo challengesNo challenges

Tempo & endurance

Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.

MeasureNiharika Parwar / Synnovia DsouzaShivanjali Thite / Shreya Mehta
Quicker points49%21 of 43 rallies51%22 of 43 rallies
Longer points48%20 of 42 rallies52%22 of 42 rallies
First game46%13 of 28 rallies54%15 of 28 rallies
Last game44%12 of 27 rallies56%15 of 27 rallies