Player comparison
Anjana Kumari vs Nidhi Nair
Women's Doubles
Data note: Anjana Kumari 6 of 6 matches umpire-scored; Nidhi Nair 2 of 2. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Anjana Kumari | Difference | Nidhi Nair |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 6–0on-court record | 0–2on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 58%227–167 points | +27 | 31%27–60 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | 4–04 played | —0 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | Riya Haldankar / Yasmin Sayed1 | —no seeded win | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 3h 14mavg 32m | +163 | 31mavg 16m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Anjana Kumari’s side of the court.
Every score reads Anjana Kumari’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Anjana Kumari | Difference | Nidhi Nair |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 56%126 of 226 rallies | +16 | 39%11 of 28 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 60%101 of 168 rallies | +33 | 27%16 of 59 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 53%87 of 163 rallies | +53 | 0%0 of 8 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 1010 rallies | +4 | 66 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 88 rallies | -2 | 1010 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Anjana Kumari | Difference | Nidhi Nair |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 48%48 of 99 rallies | +19 | 29%5 of 17 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 61%179 of 295 rallies | +29 | 31%22 of 70 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | -12 pts | -10 | -2 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 65%52 of 80 rallies | +40 | 25%5 of 20 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 63%49 of 78 rallies | +52 | 11%2 of 18 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 62%48 of 78 rallies | +23 | 39%7 of 18 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 33 points | +3 | 00 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 55 points | +3 | 22 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Anjana Kumari | Difference | Nidhi Nair |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 23.0s | +5.0s | 18.0s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 58%113 of 195 rallies | +31 | 27%12 of 44 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 58%112 of 193 rallies | +23 | 35%15 of 43 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 55%88 of 159 rallies | +21 | 35%16 of 46 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 70%90 of 129 rallies | +43 | 27%11 of 41 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 109.0s | +35.1s | 73.9s |