Player comparison
Chinmay Kamat vs Fredrick Fernandes
Men's Doubles
Data note: Chinmay Kamat 2 of 3 matches umpire-scored; Fredrick Fernandes 2 of 2. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Chinmay Kamat | Difference | Fredrick Fernandes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 1–1incl. 0–1 walkovers | 1–1on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 55%54–45 points | +5 | 49%52–54 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | —0 played | —0 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | —no seeded win | —no seeded win | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 44mavg 22m | -1 | 45mavg 23m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Chinmay Kamat’s side of the court.
Every score reads Chinmay Kamat’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Chinmay Kamat | Difference | Fredrick Fernandes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 51%27 of 53 rallies | +6 | 45%24 of 53 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 59%27 of 46 rallies | +6 | 53%28 of 53 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 50%14 of 28 rallies | +9 | 41%11 of 27 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 66 rallies | +1 | 55 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 55 rallies | -3 | 88 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Chinmay Kamat | Difference | Fredrick Fernandes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 48%10 of 21 rallies | -12 | 60%15 of 25 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 56%44 of 78 rallies | +11 | 46%37 of 81 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | -9 pts | -23 | +14 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 55%11 of 20 rallies | level | 55%11 of 20 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 44%8 of 18 rallies | -22 | 67%12 of 18 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 50%9 of 18 rallies | level | 50%9 of 18 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 00 points | -3 | 33 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 33 points | level | 33 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Chinmay Kamat | Difference | Fredrick Fernandes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 22.7s | +2.3s | 20.4s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 58%29 of 50 rallies | +15 | 43%23 of 53 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 51%25 of 49 rallies | -3 | 54%28 of 52 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 53%25 of 47 rallies | +4 | 49%24 of 49 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 56%29 of 52 rallies | +7 | 49%28 of 57 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 74.4s | level | 74.4s |