Player comparison
Neha Sahakari vs Saba Shaikh
Women's Doubles
Data note: Neha Sahakari 3 of 3 matches umpire-scored; Saba Shaikh 1 of 1. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Neha Sahakari | Difference | Saba Shaikh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 1–2on-court record | 0–1on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 50%85–86 points | +10 | 40%20–30 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | —0 played | —0 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | Saba Shaikh / Tabassum Shaikh4 | —no seeded win | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 1h 12mavg 24m | +51 | 21mavg 21m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Neha Sahakari’s side of the court.
Every score reads Neha Sahakari’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Neha Sahakari | Difference | Saba Shaikh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 38%32 of 84 rallies | +5 | 33%7 of 21 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 61%53 of 87 rallies | +16 | 45%13 of 29 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 40%17 of 43 rallies | -6 | 45%5 of 11 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 66 rallies | +3 | 33 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 55 rallies | -1 | 66 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Neha Sahakari | Difference | Saba Shaikh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 49%25 of 51 rallies | +24 | 25%3 of 12 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 50%60 of 120 rallies | +5 | 45%17 of 38 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | -1 pts | +19 | -20 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 40%12 of 30 rallies | -20 | 60%6 of 10 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 48%13 of 27 rallies | +15 | 33%3 of 9 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 59%16 of 27 rallies | +48 | 11%1 of 9 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 44 points | +4 | 00 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 22 points | -2 | 44 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Neha Sahakari | Difference | Saba Shaikh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 20.1s | -0.3s | 20.4s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 53%45 of 85 rallies | +13 | 40%10 of 25 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 47%39 of 83 rallies | +9 | 38%9 of 24 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 48%38 of 79 rallies | +6 | 42%11 of 26 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 51%47 of 92 rallies | +14 | 38%9 of 24 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 92.1s | level | 92.1s |