Player comparison
Niharika Parwar vs Shivanjali Thite
Women's Doubles · Women's Singles
Data note: Niharika Parwar 2 of 3 matches umpire-scored; Shivanjali Thite 6 of 6. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Shivanjali Thite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 0–2incl. 1–0 walkovers | 3–3on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 47%74–84 points | -3 | 50%216–219 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | 0–22 played | 1–23 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | —no seeded win | Aryaman Saraf / Sufiya Shaikh1 | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 1h 11mavg 36m | -111 | 3h 2mavg 30m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Niharika Parwar’s side of the court.
Every score reads Niharika Parwar’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Shivanjali Thite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 44%33 of 75 rallies | -3 | 47%101 of 217 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 49%41 of 83 rallies | -3 | 53%115 of 218 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 40%21 of 52 rallies | -8 | 48%63 of 131 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 88 rallies | +2 | 66 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 66 rallies | -2 | 88 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Shivanjali Thite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 49%20 of 41 rallies | -3 | 52%75 of 144 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 46%54 of 117 rallies | -2 | 48%141 of 291 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | +3 pts | -1 | +4 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 43%13 of 30 rallies | -9 | 52%39 of 75 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 47%14 of 30 rallies | +2 | 44%32 of 72 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 47%14 of 30 rallies | -2 | 49%35 of 72 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 44 points | -1 | 55 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 11 points | -3 | 44 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Niharika Parwar | Difference | Shivanjali Thite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 20.4s | +0.3s | 20.1s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 46%36 of 78 rallies | -1 | 47%102 of 218 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 48%37 of 77 rallies | -4 | 52%111 of 213 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 53%28 of 53 rallies | +2 | 51%90 of 177 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 38%18 of 48 rallies | -11 | 49%88 of 180 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 116.2s | level | 116.2s |