U9 Boys' Singles
Divyam Singh vs Rafael Anacleto De Ataide
Final · Match #7 · Court 6 · Sun, Aug 9, 3:21 PM
Summary
Rafael Anacleto De Ataide Turns Final After Losing the First Game
Divyam Singh led 1-0, but Rafael Anacleto De Ataide won the U9 Boys' Singles final on Court 6 by reversing the match's direction in the next two games: 12-15, 15-8, 15-11.
Singh opened by recovering from 2-5 down with a seven-rally run to move 9-5 ahead. Rafael briefly narrowed the gap, then Singh restored a 14-12 lead and closed the game at 15-12. That opening, however, was the only game in which Singh won more rallies: 15 to Rafael's 12.
Rafael answered immediately in game two. He took the first two rallies, stayed ahead through 8-6, and then produced the decisive burst after the interval, winning six straight rallies to turn 6-8 into 12-6. Singh could add only two more points as Rafael levelled the match 15-8.
The decider began with Singh ahead 2-0, but Rafael then won six consecutive rallies and led 8-2 at the interval. Singh's late response was substantial, a five-rally run taking him from 6-14 to 11-14, yet Rafael stopped the recovery on the next rally.
The less obvious edge was how consistently Rafael started games: he won 10 of the 15 game-opening rallies, compared with Singh's five. He also won 24 of 41 points on his serve and finished with 42 points overall to Singh's 34. After 25 minutes, Rafael had turned a first-game loss into a final victory.
U9 BS · Final
CompletedCourt 6
25:09
| Side | Games | G1 | G2 | G3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divyam Singh | 1 | 15 | 8 | 11 |
| Rafael Anacleto De Ataide, winner | 2 | 12 | 15 | 15 |
Match analytics
Both sides, from the same durable result and validated scoring record.
Data note: Rally and timing insights use the accepted umpire log; timing gaps include recovery and repositioning.
- Points played
- 76
- Match duration
- 25m
- Average scoring gap
- 15s
- Longest scoring gap
- 36s
3 games
Court 6
Between umpire taps
Game 1 at 0–0
Score & result
The durable game scores and result recorded for this match.
| Measure | Divyam Singh | Rafael Anacleto De Ataide |
|---|---|---|
| Games won | 1 | 2 |
| Points won | 34 | 42 |
| Point shareOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 45%34 of 76 points | 55%42 of 76 points |
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Divyam Singh | Rafael Anacleto De Ataide |
|---|---|---|
| On serveRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 49%17 of 35 rallies | 59%24 of 41 rallies |
| On receiveRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 41%17 of 41 rallies | 51%18 of 35 rallies |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 33%5 of 15 rallies | 67%10 of 15 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 47%7 of 15 rallies | 53%8 of 15 rallies |
| Longest streakYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 77 rallies | 88 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Divyam Singh | Rafael Anacleto De Ataide |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-end ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 59%13 of 22 rallies | 41%9 of 22 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 39%21 of 54 rallies | 61%33 of 54 rallies |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 33 points | 22 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 22 points | 33 points |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Divyam Singh | Rafael Anacleto De Ataide |
|---|---|---|
| Quicker pointsWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 50%19 of 38 rallies | 50%19 of 38 rallies |
| Longer pointsWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 39%15 of 38 rallies | 61%23 of 38 rallies |
| First gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 56%15 of 27 rallies | 44%12 of 27 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 42%11 of 26 rallies | 58%15 of 26 rallies |