Player comparison
Divyam Singh vs Rafael Anacleto De Ataide
U9 Boys' Singles
Data note: Divyam Singh 3 of 3 matches umpire-scored; Rafael Anacleto De Ataide 3 of 3. Rally and timing rows need a complete validated scoring record.How many of your matches were live-scored by an umpire. Rally-level stats only exist for those — hand-entered results keep the score but not the story.
Tournament so far
| Measure | Divyam Singh | Difference | Rafael Anacleto De Ataide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win–lossMatches won vs lost. Walkovers are shown separately — they were decided off court. | 1–2on-court record | 3–0on-court record | |
| Points wonOf every point you played, the share you won. Above 50% means you outscored your opponents overall — a fairer measure than match wins alone. | 43%70–91 points | -26 | 69%102–45 points |
| Deciding gamesYour record in final games, where the match was on the line. | 0–11 played | 1–01 played | |
| Biggest scalpThe highest-seeded opponent you beat this tournament. | —no seeded win | —no seeded win | |
| Time on courtTotal time you spent playing, and your average match length. | 51mavg 17m | +2 | 49mavg 16m |
Head to head
The meeting between these two at this tournament, from Divyam Singh’s side of the court.
Every score reads Divyam Singh’s points first.
Serve & rally
Rallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished.
| Measure | Divyam Singh | Difference | Rafael Anacleto De Ataide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serving sideRallies your side won when serving. Every rally scores a point either way, but serving sets up the attack — a low number here means the serve is being punished. | 42%30 of 71 rallies | -31 | 74%73 of 99 rallies |
| Receiving sideRallies your side won when receiving. Strong receivers turn the opponent's serve into their point. | 44%40 of 90 rallies | -16 | 60%29 of 48 rallies |
| On their own serveDoubles only: rallies won while you were the one serving — your personal serve games, separate from your pair's. | 42%30 of 71 rallies | -31 | 74%73 of 99 rallies |
| Longest streak wonYour longest run of consecutive points inside one game. | 77 rallies | -8 | 1515 rallies |
| Longest streak concededThe longest run of points you conceded in one game — the stretch that got away. | 99 rallies | +2 | 77 rallies |
Pressure & momentum
Rallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games.
| Measure | Divyam Singh | Difference | Rafael Anacleto De Ataide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch ralliesRallies at tight endgame scores — the last few points of a game, scaled to its format (18+ in a 21-point game, 12+ in a 15-point game). These points decide close games. | 58%22 of 38 rallies | level | 58%21 of 36 rallies |
| Baseline ralliesAll other rallies — your normal level, used as the comparison for clutch play. | 39%48 of 123 rallies | -34 | 73%81 of 111 rallies |
| Clutch deltaClutch win rate minus normal win rate, in percentage points. Positive means you raise your game when it matters; negative means tight endings are costing you. | +19 pts | +34 | -15 pts |
| First 5 ralliesPoints won in the first five rallies of each game — do you start switched on or need time to warm up? | 34%12 of 35 rallies | -37 | 71%25 of 35 rallies |
| Before intervalsPoints won in the last three rallies before a break. | 48%16 of 33 rallies | -24 | 73%24 of 33 rallies |
| After intervalsPoints won in the first three rallies after a break — does the reset (and the coaching) help? | 42%14 of 33 rallies | -30 | 73%24 of 33 rallies |
| Challenge accuracyLine-call reviews you asked for, and how many went your way. | —No challenges | —No challenges | |
| Max deficit overcomeThe biggest deficit you clawed back in a game you went on to win. | 33 points | +1 | 22 points |
| Max lead surrenderedThe biggest lead you let slip in a game you went on to lose. | 22 points | -1 | 33 points |
Tempo & endurance
Average time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally.
| Measure | Divyam Singh | Difference | Rafael Anacleto De Ataide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rally gapAverage time between points, from the umpire's scoring taps. Approximate — it includes the walk back to position, not just the rally. | 15.2s | -0.1s | 15.2s |
| Short-gap ralliesWin rate in quicker points (below this match's median gap) — a proxy for attacking, short exchanges. | 46%37 of 81 rallies | -22 | 68%50 of 74 rallies |
| Long-gap ralliesWin rate in longer points — a proxy for grinding rallies. Compare with short rallies to see where you win. | 41%33 of 80 rallies | -30 | 71%52 of 73 rallies |
| Game 1Point win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 46%32 of 69 rallies | -17 | 64%42 of 66 rallies |
| Last gamePoint win rate in game 1 vs the last game — did your level hold up as the match went on? | 43%30 of 69 rallies | -34 | 78%45 of 58 rallies |
| Longest rally gapThe longest time between two scoring taps, with the score it happened at — most likely the longest rally of your match. | 55.9s | -57.9s | 113.8s |